My Blog List

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

More Insight on Gastric Byspass Surgery: CSB #6





As many probably already know, a popular weight loss surgery called “Roux-en-Y” gastric bypass helps morbidly obese people lose weight and turn around their lives. They lose one-third of their digestive tract, rid themselves of diseases such as diabetes, and lose a lot of weight. But what still remain a mystery is why exactly people lose weight after the surgery. Megan Dailey believes she has the answer that gives more insight into eating disorders and depth into the surgery itself. Once you find out more about the relationship between food and the body, you can gain a different perception into the impact of eating disorders on the body. Dailey's research showed that when patients undergo this surgery, the food bypasses the duodenum, a pharynx between the stomach and small intestine. It travels directly to a place called the jejenum and consequently, the jejenum receives more nutrients. This promps the release of hormones that affect the appetite in a good way. And this is why people's appetites are curbed after this surgery. To test her theory, Dailey mimicked the effects of bypass surgery on rats. She injected nutrients into the jejenum directly and observed that all the rats consistently lost weight. Dailey also discovered that GLP1 and PYY, hormones that effect appetite, were released at a higher pace. Since rats body's are quite similar to those of humans, we can almost most definitely conclude that the humans' need to eat lessens after bypass surgery. Now, I believe that it is very fascinating to learn about the body and its digestive system. I cannot wait to learn about it in science class! I hope that the research from this study can help scientists better understand eating disorders and the body in general. By doing that, techniques to help the poor people effected by eating disorders and obesity could be improved as well as their conditions. I hope that the research regarding bypass surgery and the digestive system in general will continue to develop and grow. \

Citations+Sources:
Dailey, Megan. "A common surgery could clarify eating disorders while it mends
     obesity." Hopkins BrainWise Spring 2011 30 Mar. 2011: n. pag. Hopkins 
     Medicine . Web. 31 Mar. 2011. <http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/
     publications/psychiatry_newsletter/hopkins_brainwise_spring_2011/
     embraceable_roux>.
http://paladinpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/obese_gastric_bypass_surgery-300x199.jpg

Monday, May 9, 2011

Widely Believed Allergy Remedy Dispelled





Some people have believed for some time that honey can help aid and possibly even cure allergies. The reasoning behind this is that since bees pollinate flowers and are covered in pollen, all the pollen should transfer over to honey. Therefore, if you consume a little bit of honey each day, your system should gradually be able to handle pollen in higher amounts.   So, the University of Connecticut Health Center decided to put this belief to test. The research team would give different substances to people affected with allergies and see if any type of honey would add relief to allergies. The 36 people were split into three groups: one would receive local honey, the other commercial honey, and the last corn syrup that was made to taste like honey (the placebo group). After a few months went by, none of the groups reported having relief or aggravation and this myth was proved wrong. According to Doctor Stanley Fineman, president of a college that specializes in allergies and asthma, "Seasonal allergies are usually triggered by wind borne pollens, not by pollens spread by insects." To me, I found this to be a real bummer, since I suffer from pretty bad allergies. When I first saw this title, I was secretly hoping that this might be the key to end itchy eyes and constant sneezing. Oh well. I am sure many other allergy-stricken people will be surprised and slightly saddened when they hear this news, but I found it interesting that allergies were caused by wind borne pollens, a fact I was unaware of before. This article made me wonder what other remedies there might be out there that people habitually (and stupidly) follow in hope of curing whatever ailment they need to cure.













Citations: 


 O'Connor, Anahad. "Eating Local Honey Cures Allergies." The New York Times.
     N.p., 9 May 2011. Web. 9 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/
     health/10really.html?_r=1&ref=science>.

J, Clive. "Effect of ingestion of honey on symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis."
     Pub Med. Gov . N.p., 7 May 2011. Web. 9 May 2011.
     <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11868925>. 

Picture url:  http://healthproductreviewsite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/allergic-reaction.jpg


Tuesday, May 3, 2011

CSB #8: Muscle Experiment



authors: Emma Malysz, Gabi Gupta, Jackie An, Vivian Isenberg 

How are muscles of the forearm and hand affected by different temperatures of water, including ice water, warm water (50ºC), and room temperature(16ºC) water?

Have you ever been out on a cold day and realized that it is difficult to open a door and carry all of your books and pencils? Doesn’t it feel easier to do this when it is warm outside? We hypothesized that the warmer the temperature, the higher the force, but we decided to test it. By using the Vernier dynamometer, shown on the right, we were able to measure the force released by our hand grip. We placedboth dominant and non-dominanthands in a one liter bucket of water for 30 seconds and gripped the device for 15 seconds, exerting as much force as possible, measuring the difference in the muscle patterns. We set upthree different buckets, each containing a different temperature of water. The first has ice water (0ºC), the second had room temperature (16ºC), and the last contained warm water (50ºC). Before conducting the experiment, all four of us believed that the force of the right-hand placed in warm water would result in the strongest force, as it was our dominant hands and the warmest environment. We thought that the warmer temperatures would relax the muscles, giving us the highest results. Also, we felt the weakest would be the left hand in cold water, as it was our non-dominant hand in the coldest environment. 


First, our group, all right handed, put our right hands into the bucket of ice water. Despite many complaints from the group members, each of us managed to survive the 30 seconds in the ice water. Each of us felt that it was extremely difficult to apply force to the hand grip, as our hands were all freezing. The graph on the right shows Jackie in red, Gabi in blue, Vivian in green, anEmma in orange. Jackie’s maximum force was 106.8 N, Gabi’s was 145.3 N, Vivian’s was was 178.3 N, and Emma’s was 180.9 N. Similarly to what we believed, we received different results while doing the left hand, which is shown on the left. Vivian actually surpassed her previous force, with her maximum force becoming 190.7 N. Gabi, Jackie, and Emma’s all decreased.

After the ice experiment, each of the team members waited for exactly 6 minutes before putting their hands in the 16ºC water. Same as before, each of us tested our right hands first. The colors and their matching person are the same as mentionedabove. However this time, Vivian’s maximum force was the strongest, 184.7 N, followed by Jackie, 153.4 N, then Gabi, 152.6 N, and finally Emma, 129.9 N. Then, we tested the left hand, which had different results as well. Once again, Vivian’s left hand was stronger than her right, with a maximum force of 187.1 N. Jackie, Gabi, and Emma received almost identical results to their right hand, yet each of them had larger drops. This suggests that they could not hold the strength for as long as they could with the right hand. If you look at the two graphs, you can see drops in all four of the members, but in the graph on the left, the drops are much larger and much more frequent. 

Finally, our group tested our hands in the 50ºC water. We hypothesized that the best results would come from the right hand placed in the warm water. Onceagain, Vivian had the most force, with the maximum as 209.0 N. This was herstrongest trial by over 25. This time, Jackie was the second strongest, with a maximum as 191.0 which was also her strongest. Following Jackie was Emma, whose force was 183.2, another personal best. Last was Gabi, who had her strongest of 177.7 N. All four of the group members had the strongest results during this trial. Next, we tested the left hand. Emma’s was 200.9 N, Vivian’s was 160.5 N, Jackie’s was 169.1 N, and finally, Gabi’s was 114.3 N. Emma’s left hand in the hot water resulted in her highest score during the experiment, whereas the other three approached their average score. 

After graphing the results, we found the average and made graphs. The following graph shows the all of the right hand results and the averages. Vivian had the highest average (190.67 N), then Emma (164.67 N), then Gabi (158.53 N), and finally Jackie (150.4 N). The averages from our left hand show that Emma’s, Vivian’s, and Gabi’s forces were all slightly less on their left hand, even though Emma and Vivian received their highest on their left hand. Jackie’s was slightly higher. The highest score for Emma was her left hand, warmest experiment, and her weakest was her right hand, room temperature water. The highest score for Jackie was her right hand, warm water, and her weakest was her right hand, cold water. Gabi’s strongest was her right hand, warm water, and her weakest was her left hand, warm water.Vivian’s strongest was her right hand warm water, and her weakest was her left hand, warm water. Three out of four members had their strongest test with their dominant hand in the warm water, which is what we originally thought. However, before we believed that the weakest results would be the left hand cold water, but 50% of the group had their weakest results while their left hand was in warm water. This result may be because our hands were tired at this point. If we had more time to conduct this experiment, our results may have varied and been closer to our hypothesis. Our experiment explored the realms of biology, particularly the muscular system. It also involves some facts about homeostasis and body temperature. While in a different environment, the muscles proved to act differently, which is what we were testing in the first place. We believe this experiment is great for aspiring scientists or anyone who is curious about muscle and their relationship to different extreme temperatures. If you ever do this experiment or something related to muscle strength and temperature, we would love to hear from you! 

*all forces are shown in Newtons (N)